<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1016 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439442</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the CHA Licence, finding it beyond prescribed time limits and lacking corroborating evidence. The forfeiture of the entire security deposit was deemed disproportionate, with only a nominal amount ordered to be forfeited instead. The appeal was allowed in part, overturning the license revocation and adjusting the security deposit forfeiture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2023 08:47:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1016 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439442</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the CHA Licence, finding it beyond prescribed time limits and lacking corroborating evidence. The forfeiture of the entire security deposit was deemed disproportionate, with only a nominal amount ordered to be forfeited instead. The appeal was allowed in part, overturning the license revocation and adjusting the security deposit forfeiture.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>