<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 998 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439424</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the commission received by the appellant in connection with the sale of SIM cards was not liable to service tax under business auxiliary service as the appellant&#039;s relation with the principal client was on a principal-to-principal basis, engaging in trading activity. Citing precedents, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating the issue had been settled in favor of the assessee. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2023 08:46:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 998 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439424</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the commission received by the appellant in connection with the sale of SIM cards was not liable to service tax under business auxiliary service as the appellant&#039;s relation with the principal client was on a principal-to-principal basis, engaging in trading activity. Citing precedents, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating the issue had been settled in favor of the assessee. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>