<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 997 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439423</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the service tax demand for the period before 16.05.2008 and the penalties imposed under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994. The service tax liability for the period after 16.05.2008, which was already paid by the appellant, was upheld. The appeal was allowed in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2023 08:46:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 997 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439423</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the service tax demand for the period before 16.05.2008 and the penalties imposed under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994. The service tax liability for the period after 16.05.2008, which was already paid by the appellant, was upheld. The appeal was allowed in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>