<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 84 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33112</link>
    <description>The High Court of Gujarat upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing depreciation on assets within a block of assets under the Income-tax Act, 1961, even if not all assets were used in the relevant year. The Court emphasized that once assets are put to use, depreciation cannot be restricted based on partial usage, and items within a block of assets cannot be segregated for depreciation purposes. The Court found no legal flaw in the Tribunal&#039;s approach, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 84 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33112</link>
      <description>The High Court of Gujarat upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing depreciation on assets within a block of assets under the Income-tax Act, 1961, even if not all assets were used in the relevant year. The Court emphasized that once assets are put to use, depreciation cannot be restricted based on partial usage, and items within a block of assets cannot be segregated for depreciation purposes. The Court found no legal flaw in the Tribunal&#039;s approach, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>