<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1363 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308406</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order, as the first substantial question was deemed unnecessary due to the assessee&#039;s success in prior cases. The Court discussed the CIT(A)&#039;s authority to enhance assessments and the treatment of superannuation fund contributions, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee based on precedent. The appeals were dismissed without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 12:51:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1363 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308406</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order, as the first substantial question was deemed unnecessary due to the assessee&#039;s success in prior cases. The Court discussed the CIT(A)&#039;s authority to enhance assessments and the treatment of superannuation fund contributions, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee based on precedent. The appeals were dismissed without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>