<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1655 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308407</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat expenses for membrane cell replacement as revenue expenditure, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court emphasized the importance of considering the nature of expenditure and the integral role of membrane cells in the plant&#039;s operation for tax liability determination. Reference to a previous judgment involving the same assessee further supported the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 12:51:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1655 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308407</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat expenses for membrane cell replacement as revenue expenditure, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court emphasized the importance of considering the nature of expenditure and the integral role of membrane cells in the plant&#039;s operation for tax liability determination. Reference to a previous judgment involving the same assessee further supported the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>