https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439382 The Tribunal found that the remuneration received by the cricket player for playing in the Indian Premier League matches was not for brand promotion services but for his employment with the company. Therefore, the demand for service tax under Business Auxiliary Service was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant. en-us Wed, 21 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jun 2023 07:49:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439382 The Tribunal found that the remuneration received by the cricket player for playing in the Indian Premier League matches was not for brand promotion services but for his employment with the company. Therefore, the demand for service tax under Business Auxiliary Service was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 21 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439382