https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308394 The appeal for AY 2010-11 was dismissed due to relief already granted in Section 154 rectification proceedings. The next two appeals for AYs 2006-07 and 2011-12, challenging the disallowance of agricultural income claim, were remanded back to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication due to lack of evidence of service of hearing notices. The first appeal was dismissed as not pressed, while the latter twin appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with a directive for fresh adjudication within a specified timeframe. en-us Mon, 19 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jun 2023 19:23:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308394 The appeal for AY 2010-11 was dismissed due to relief already granted in Section 154 rectification proceedings. The next two appeals for AYs 2006-07 and 2011-12, challenging the disallowance of agricultural income claim, were remanded back to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication due to lack of evidence of service of hearing notices. The first appeal was dismissed as not pressed, while the latter twin appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with a directive for fresh adjudication within a specified timeframe. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 19 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308394