<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 1106 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308397</link>
    <description>A socio-beneficial insurance scheme for marginal farmers and bereaved families was held to be governed by a reasonable claim period. The Court found the rejection of a claim as time-barred unsustainable because it was filed within the condonable period reckoned from the date of death and policy expiry. It also held the scheme&#039;s short limitation period, with only limited condonation, to be arbitrary and unreasonable as it defeated the scheme&#039;s object and was inconsistent with the governing law on insurance contracts. The impugned rejection was quashed, and the limitation clause was replaced with a three-year period from the date of death or rejection of the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 19:23:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 1106 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308397</link>
      <description>A socio-beneficial insurance scheme for marginal farmers and bereaved families was held to be governed by a reasonable claim period. The Court found the rejection of a claim as time-barred unsustainable because it was filed within the condonable period reckoned from the date of death and policy expiry. It also held the scheme&#039;s short limitation period, with only limited condonation, to be arbitrary and unreasonable as it defeated the scheme&#039;s object and was inconsistent with the governing law on insurance contracts. The impugned rejection was quashed, and the limitation clause was replaced with a three-year period from the date of death or rejection of the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>