<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 417 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308393</link>
    <description>The challenge to anticipatory bail became infructuous once the respondent was arrested and taken into custody, so the appeal was dismissed on that basis, while any complaint about breach of the earlier order was left open before the appropriate forum. The Court also held that anticipatory bail applications relating to alleged offences within Assam should be heard only after notice to the State, and, for practical consistency, by the High Court of Guwahati. The impugned anticipatory bail orders were set aside and the matters were transferred for fresh hearing by a Division Bench, with similar connected applications directed to be placed before the same Bench to avoid conflicting orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 18:17:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 417 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308393</link>
      <description>The challenge to anticipatory bail became infructuous once the respondent was arrested and taken into custody, so the appeal was dismissed on that basis, while any complaint about breach of the earlier order was left open before the appropriate forum. The Court also held that anticipatory bail applications relating to alleged offences within Assam should be heard only after notice to the State, and, for practical consistency, by the High Court of Guwahati. The impugned anticipatory bail orders were set aside and the matters were transferred for fresh hearing by a Division Bench, with similar connected applications directed to be placed before the same Bench to avoid conflicting orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>