https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439363 HC ruled in favor of petitioner regarding e-way bill interception. Vehicle was detained due to expired bill, but court found interception timing allowed for revalidation. Following previous precedent, HC set aside penalty orders and directed refund possibility within 21 days. Petitioner granted right to challenge penalty based on specific case circumstances. en-us Thu, 04 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Apr 2025 12:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439363 HC ruled in favor of petitioner regarding e-way bill interception. Vehicle was detained due to expired bill, but court found interception timing allowed for revalidation. Following previous precedent, HC set aside penalty orders and directed refund possibility within 21 days. Petitioner granted right to challenge penalty based on specific case circumstances. Case-Laws GST Thu, 04 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439363