<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 935 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439361</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ, holding the reopening and draft assessment void for breach of natural justice because the respondent afforded under 12 hours to reply, failed to supply requested documents and denied opportunity to cross-examine a material witness. The court found the time and absence of requested materials/precluded cross-examination prevented a reasonable opportunity to defend, and therefore the reassessment proceedings were set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 935 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439361</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ, holding the reopening and draft assessment void for breach of natural justice because the respondent afforded under 12 hours to reply, failed to supply requested documents and denied opportunity to cross-examine a material witness. The court found the time and absence of requested materials/precluded cross-examination prevented a reasonable opportunity to defend, and therefore the reassessment proceedings were set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>