https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439354 The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, who had been penalized under section 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with notices issued under section 142(1). The Tribunal found that the appellant had indeed complied with the notices, as evidenced by acknowledgements on the ITBA Portal. Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the penalty unjustified and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty of Rs. 20,000. en-us Tue, 20 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jun 2023 09:06:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439354 The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, who had been penalized under section 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with notices issued under section 142(1). The Tribunal found that the appellant had indeed complied with the notices, as evidenced by acknowledgements on the ITBA Portal. Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the penalty unjustified and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty of Rs. 20,000. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 20 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439354