<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 12 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33095</link>
    <description>The court held that the initiation of reassessment proceedings based on the MODVAT credit balance was invalid as it did not provide a reasonable basis for believing that income had escaped assessment. Additionally, the Assessing Officer&#039;s inclusion of unrelated items in the reassessment was deemed beyond the scope of Section 147, leading to the invalidation of the reassessment order. The appeal was allowed, and the reassessment order was set aside with no orders as to cost.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 12 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33095</link>
      <description>The court held that the initiation of reassessment proceedings based on the MODVAT credit balance was invalid as it did not provide a reasonable basis for believing that income had escaped assessment. Additionally, the Assessing Officer&#039;s inclusion of unrelated items in the reassessment was deemed beyond the scope of Section 147, leading to the invalidation of the reassessment order. The appeal was allowed, and the reassessment order was set aside with no orders as to cost.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>