<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 102 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33094</link>
    <description>The judgment concluded that unjust enrichment applies to second-hand goods as their sale price includes elements of purchase cost, duties, and expenses. The reliance on the Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate without supporting documents was deemed inadequate, especially due to reported loss of relevant records. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in his decision, leading to orders being set aside, and cases remanded for a fresh decision by the original adjudicating authority. Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 102 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33094</link>
      <description>The judgment concluded that unjust enrichment applies to second-hand goods as their sale price includes elements of purchase cost, duties, and expenses. The reliance on the Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate without supporting documents was deemed inadequate, especially due to reported loss of relevant records. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in his decision, leading to orders being set aside, and cases remanded for a fresh decision by the original adjudicating authority. Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>