<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 913 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439339</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal regarding the imposition of anti-dumping duty on Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFL) imported from China and Hongkong. Relying on precedent, the Court held that duty could not be collected retroactively after the provisional duty period ended. The impugned order was set aside, and pending applications were disposed of accordingly, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 913 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439339</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal regarding the imposition of anti-dumping duty on Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFL) imported from China and Hongkong. Relying on precedent, the Court held that duty could not be collected retroactively after the provisional duty period ended. The impugned order was set aside, and pending applications were disposed of accordingly, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>