<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 907 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS CUSTOMS, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439333</link>
    <description>Data centre switch router models were classified under sub-heading 85176290 because they were composite network equipment performing switching and routing functions, and their principal function was routing under Rule 1 of the General Rules for Interpretation and Note 3 to Section XVI. On that basis, the goods qualified as routers for Sr. No. 13N of Notification No. 24/2005-Customs, which was applied according to its plain text. However, the concessional benefit under Sr. No. 20 of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs was denied because the goods were capable of functioning as carrier-grade ethernet switches and the notification expressly excluded carrier ethernet switches.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 907 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS CUSTOMS, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439333</link>
      <description>Data centre switch router models were classified under sub-heading 85176290 because they were composite network equipment performing switching and routing functions, and their principal function was routing under Rule 1 of the General Rules for Interpretation and Note 3 to Section XVI. On that basis, the goods qualified as routers for Sr. No. 13N of Notification No. 24/2005-Customs, which was applied according to its plain text. However, the concessional benefit under Sr. No. 20 of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs was denied because the goods were capable of functioning as carrier-grade ethernet switches and the notification expressly excluded carrier ethernet switches.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>