https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33092 The Foreign Trade Policy's grievance redressal mechanism covered disputes over Duty Free Credit Entitlement claims, and the Committee was competent to decide the petitioner's entitlement because the dispute concerned the benefit itself, not the licence or certificate. Its duly approved decision was valid and could not be kept in abeyance without lawful variation, review, or challenge. The respondents were therefore required to implement the decision and could not withhold the benefit merely because it might affect the government's position in other proceedings. en-us Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33092 The Foreign Trade Policy's grievance redressal mechanism covered disputes over Duty Free Credit Entitlement claims, and the Committee was competent to decide the petitioner's entitlement because the dispute concerned the benefit itself, not the licence or certificate. Its duly approved decision was valid and could not be kept in abeyance without lawful variation, review, or challenge. The respondents were therefore required to implement the decision and could not withhold the benefit merely because it might affect the government's position in other proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33092