<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2838 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308381</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the gains from the sale of land should be classified as capital gains, not business income, as the land was held for agricultural purposes for 20 years. Consequently, the assessee was eligible for the deduction under Section 54F and indexation benefits. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:35:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2838 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308381</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the gains from the sale of land should be classified as capital gains, not business income, as the land was held for agricultural purposes for 20 years. Consequently, the assessee was eligible for the deduction under Section 54F and indexation benefits. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>