https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33087 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging certain words in a policy circular regarding import licenses for marble blocks. The court found that the circular, specifically Annexure-4, was not arbitrary or unconstitutional. It noted that the circular did not completely exclude SIL license holders from availing import licenses, ensuring continuity of entitlement. The court emphasized the broader base of eligible entities under Annexure-4 and comparable import limits under both Annexure-3 and Annexure-4. The decision aimed to ensure fairness and non-discrimination in granting import licenses for marble blocks. en-us Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33087 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging certain words in a policy circular regarding import licenses for marble blocks. The court found that the circular, specifically Annexure-4, was not arbitrary or unconstitutional. It noted that the circular did not completely exclude SIL license holders from availing import licenses, ensuring continuity of entitlement. The court emphasized the broader base of eligible entities under Annexure-4 and comparable import limits under both Annexure-3 and Annexure-4. The decision aimed to ensure fairness and non-discrimination in granting import licenses for marble blocks. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33087