<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Short TDS Deduction u/s 194C Instead of 194J Doesn&#039;t Make Assessee a Defaulter Per Section 40(a)(ia.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70478</link>
    <description>Short deduction of TDS - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - payment to sub-contractors - default u/s. 201 - where tax was deductable u/s. 194J but was actually deducted u/s. 194C, such a short deduction would not meet requirements of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act as assessee could not be held as defaulter when there was only shortfall in deduction of TDS - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:47:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:47:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Short TDS Deduction u/s 194C Instead of 194J Doesn&#039;t Make Assessee a Defaulter Per Section 40(a)(ia.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70478</link>
      <description>Short deduction of TDS - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - payment to sub-contractors - default u/s. 201 - where tax was deductable u/s. 194J but was actually deducted u/s. 194C, such a short deduction would not meet requirements of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act as assessee could not be held as defaulter when there was only shortfall in deduction of TDS - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:47:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>