<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 886 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439312</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petition, quashing the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act dated 30.03.2021 and the subsequent order dated 25.02.2022. It ruled that reopening the assessment was impermissible as it was based on information already available during the original assessment, without any new tangible material. The Court held that reopening beyond four years requires new material, which was absent in this case, thereby invalidating the respondents&#039; actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 886 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439312</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petition, quashing the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act dated 30.03.2021 and the subsequent order dated 25.02.2022. It ruled that reopening the assessment was impermissible as it was based on information already available during the original assessment, without any new tangible material. The Court held that reopening beyond four years requires new material, which was absent in this case, thereby invalidating the respondents&#039; actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>