<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 76 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33084</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s judgment on a case involving differential duty claimed by the Department on grounds of undervaluation and clandestine removal. The Court remitted the matters back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration in accordance with the law. Department&#039;s Civil Appeals were allowed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 76 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33084</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s judgment on a case involving differential duty claimed by the Department on grounds of undervaluation and clandestine removal. The Court remitted the matters back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration in accordance with the law. Department&#039;s Civil Appeals were allowed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>