<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 867 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439293</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals for AY 2018-19 and AY 2019-20, upholding the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on deletion of additions related to bogus purchase expenses and bogus unsecured loans. The tribunal found no fault in the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning and upheld the deletion of Rs. 68,94,145/- and Rs. 2,21,04,615/- for the respective assessment years. The cross-objections by the assessee were also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:12:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 867 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439293</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals for AY 2018-19 and AY 2019-20, upholding the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on deletion of additions related to bogus purchase expenses and bogus unsecured loans. The tribunal found no fault in the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning and upheld the deletion of Rs. 68,94,145/- and Rs. 2,21,04,615/- for the respective assessment years. The cross-objections by the assessee were also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>