<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 298 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33081</link>
    <description>Commodities packed without the purchaser being present remain &quot;pre-packed commodities&quot; if they satisfy the statutory definitions, even when opened later for display, inspection or testing before sale. The applicability of the packaging and declaration regime turns on the objective nature of the package, not on the subjective intention of the manufacturer, dealer or retailer. Single-unit packages and commodities covered by the Third and Fifth Schedules also continue to attract quantity and retail price declarations, including categories such as ready-made garments and similar scheduled goods. The statutory scheme was therefore treated as applying to the disputed commodities, and the contrary view was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 298 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33081</link>
      <description>Commodities packed without the purchaser being present remain &quot;pre-packed commodities&quot; if they satisfy the statutory definitions, even when opened later for display, inspection or testing before sale. The applicability of the packaging and declaration regime turns on the objective nature of the package, not on the subjective intention of the manufacturer, dealer or retailer. Single-unit packages and commodities covered by the Third and Fifth Schedules also continue to attract quantity and retail price declarations, including categories such as ready-made garments and similar scheduled goods. The statutory scheme was therefore treated as applying to the disputed commodities, and the contrary view was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>