https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439281 Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC should not be used to quash an FIR where the allegations disclose a prima facie cognizable offence and no Bhajan Lal exception is made out. Allegations of forgery, impersonation, unauthorized access to an email account, and use of a forged resignation letter and Form DIR-12 required investigation, and the truth of the disputed signatures and documents could not be decided at the threshold. A plea of mala fides was found insufficient to stop the criminal process, so the proceeding was allowed to continue. en-us Mon, 19 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Jun 2023 22:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439281 Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC should not be used to quash an FIR where the allegations disclose a prima facie cognizable offence and no Bhajan Lal exception is made out. Allegations of forgery, impersonation, unauthorized access to an email account, and use of a forged resignation letter and Form DIR-12 required investigation, and the truth of the disputed signatures and documents could not be decided at the threshold. A plea of mala fides was found insufficient to stop the criminal process, so the proceeding was allowed to continue. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 19 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439281