https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439280 An invoice-based jurisdiction objection failed because the clause depended on an actual dispute, and no timely dispute or invoice discrepancy had been raised; payment was not shown to be contractually payable in Delhi, and the creditor-location argument could not override the place of performance in Maharashtra. Partners of the limited liability partnership were also wrongly impleaded, because the claim was against the firm on invoices and no pleaded wrongful act or omission by the partners supported personal liability. With no bona fide triable issue and the written invoice liability remaining uncontroverted, the summary suit was fit for decree with interest. en-us Fri, 16 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Jun 2023 22:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439280 An invoice-based jurisdiction objection failed because the clause depended on an actual dispute, and no timely dispute or invoice discrepancy had been raised; payment was not shown to be contractually payable in Delhi, and the creditor-location argument could not override the place of performance in Maharashtra. Partners of the limited liability partnership were also wrongly impleaded, because the claim was against the firm on invoices and no pleaded wrongful act or omission by the partners supported personal liability. With no bona fide triable issue and the written invoice liability remaining uncontroverted, the summary suit was fit for decree with interest. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 16 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439280