<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 849 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439275</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax on the Fixed Facility Charges (FFC) collected for providing storage tanks. Additionally, the Tribunal set aside the order requiring the FFC to be included in the assessable value for excise duty, as the appellant had already been discharging excise duty on the FFC based on a Board circular. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 21:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 849 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439275</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax on the Fixed Facility Charges (FFC) collected for providing storage tanks. Additionally, the Tribunal set aside the order requiring the FFC to be included in the assessable value for excise duty, as the appellant had already been discharging excise duty on the FFC based on a Board circular. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>