<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 846 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439272</link>
    <description>Service tax on rental income from co-owned immovable property was held unsustainable where each co-owner&#039;s separate receipt fell below the threshold limit for levy. The Tribunal applied the principle that co-owners must be assessed individually for threshold eligibility, following earlier decisions in the same line of cases and other supporting rulings. On that basis, the demand was set aside and the impugned order was reversed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:10:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 846 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439272</link>
      <description>Service tax on rental income from co-owned immovable property was held unsustainable where each co-owner&#039;s separate receipt fell below the threshold limit for levy. The Tribunal applied the principle that co-owners must be assessed individually for threshold eligibility, following earlier decisions in the same line of cases and other supporting rulings. On that basis, the demand was set aside and the impugned order was reversed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>