<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 841 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439267</link>
    <description>Revisional jurisdiction under the Himachal Pradesh VAT Act is confined to orders expressly covered by the revisional provision, so a rectification order passed by the Tribunal is outside its scope, and a belated challenge to the principal order remains barred by limitation. The text also notes that stainless steel scrap was treated as a non-ferrous alloy under the Entry Tax Act on the plain wording of the relevant schedule entry, with no separate ferrous and non-ferrous distinction read into the statute. As no error of law or unanswered question of law was shown, revisional interference was unavailable and the Tribunal&#039;s classification stood.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:10:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 841 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439267</link>
      <description>Revisional jurisdiction under the Himachal Pradesh VAT Act is confined to orders expressly covered by the revisional provision, so a rectification order passed by the Tribunal is outside its scope, and a belated challenge to the principal order remains barred by limitation. The text also notes that stainless steel scrap was treated as a non-ferrous alloy under the Entry Tax Act on the plain wording of the relevant schedule entry, with no separate ferrous and non-ferrous distinction read into the statute. As no error of law or unanswered question of law was shown, revisional interference was unavailable and the Tribunal&#039;s classification stood.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>