https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308372 Section 24(2) of the 2013 land acquisition law was applied in line with Indore Development Authority, under which acquisition does not lapse where possession has been taken or compensation has been paid or tendered, and time covered by interim court orders is excluded from the five-year computation. The High Court's lapse finding, based on a contrary view, was set aside. As the writ petitions also raised other substantive challenges to the acquisition that had not been decided, the matters were remitted for fresh adjudication on all remaining issues. en-us Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Jun 2023 21:05:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308372 Section 24(2) of the 2013 land acquisition law was applied in line with Indore Development Authority, under which acquisition does not lapse where possession has been taken or compensation has been paid or tendered, and time covered by interim court orders is excluded from the five-year computation. The High Court's lapse finding, based on a contrary view, was set aside. As the writ petitions also raised other substantive challenges to the acquisition that had not been decided, the matters were remitted for fresh adjudication on all remaining issues. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308372