<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 379 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33075</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petition, quashed the order of framing charges, and discharged the petitioners. It was held that initiating both adjudication and criminal proceedings simultaneously is legal, with findings in adjudication not constituting res judicata or double jeopardy. Exoneration in adjudication on merits warrants discontinuation of criminal prosecution. The exoneration in this case was on merits, and continuing criminal prosecution was deemed unjust. The Court criticized the Department for pursuing criminal prosecution despite failing in adjudication and imposed costs on the respondents for unnecessary litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 379 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33075</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petition, quashed the order of framing charges, and discharged the petitioners. It was held that initiating both adjudication and criminal proceedings simultaneously is legal, with findings in adjudication not constituting res judicata or double jeopardy. Exoneration in adjudication on merits warrants discontinuation of criminal prosecution. The exoneration in this case was on merits, and continuing criminal prosecution was deemed unjust. The Court criticized the Department for pursuing criminal prosecution despite failing in adjudication and imposed costs on the respondents for unnecessary litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>