<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 309 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33071</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on duty-paid molasses used to manufacture rectified spirit was not required to be reversed merely because the rectified spirit was captively consumed in making exempted country liquor. The Tribunal applied Rule 57CC on the basis that captive clearance of exempted goods can be treated as a deemed sale, and the prescribed 8% reversal functions as a presumptive amount linked to the value of the exempted goods. Since the assessee had already reversed 8% of the price of rectified spirit on a comparable market-value basis, the absence of an actual factory-gate sale did not support any further demand for credit reversal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 309 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33071</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on duty-paid molasses used to manufacture rectified spirit was not required to be reversed merely because the rectified spirit was captively consumed in making exempted country liquor. The Tribunal applied Rule 57CC on the basis that captive clearance of exempted goods can be treated as a deemed sale, and the prescribed 8% reversal functions as a presumptive amount linked to the value of the exempted goods. Since the assessee had already reversed 8% of the price of rectified spirit on a comparable market-value basis, the absence of an actual factory-gate sale did not support any further demand for credit reversal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>