https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439251 Binding precedent governed the dispute on income-tax exemptions: the Court applied the ratio of its earlier decision in Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority and found the impugned order to fall squarely within that authority. In view of the settled law already declared, no fresh merits-based reconsideration was warranted and the Court declined to interfere with or disturb the impugned order. The special leave petition was dismissed, and the pending applications were disposed of accordingly. en-us Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jun 2026 10:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439251 Binding precedent governed the dispute on income-tax exemptions: the Court applied the ratio of its earlier decision in Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority and found the impugned order to fall squarely within that authority. In view of the settled law already declared, no fresh merits-based reconsideration was warranted and the Court declined to interfere with or disturb the impugned order. The special leave petition was dismissed, and the pending applications were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439251