<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 811 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439237</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2009-10, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for disallowed expenditure on raising authorized share capital and capitalization of interest expenditure. For the assessment year 2010-11, the ITAT partly allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty related to interest expenditure but upholding the penalty for foreign traveling expenses due to insufficient substantiation provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2023 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=717044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 811 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439237</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2009-10, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for disallowed expenditure on raising authorized share capital and capitalization of interest expenditure. For the assessment year 2010-11, the ITAT partly allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty related to interest expenditure but upholding the penalty for foreign traveling expenses due to insufficient substantiation provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>