<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 297 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33066</link>
    <description>Technical know-how fee paid for manufacture in India was not includible in the customs assessable value of imported components where the agreement showed no nexus with the imported goods and no condition linking the payment to their import. The proposed 20% loading also could not be sustained because the Revenue provided no basis or supporting reasoning for the enhancement. Customs value, therefore, could not be increased on either ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 297 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33066</link>
      <description>Technical know-how fee paid for manufacture in India was not includible in the customs assessable value of imported components where the agreement showed no nexus with the imported goods and no condition linking the payment to their import. The proposed 20% loading also could not be sustained because the Revenue provided no basis or supporting reasoning for the enhancement. Customs value, therefore, could not be increased on either ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>