https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439208 The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority due to the alleged clandestine removal of MS items during a period of labour unrest, leading to discrepancies in stock quantities. The Appellant was not given the opportunity of a Personal Hearing, resulting in ex-parte orders. The Tribunal recognized the need for verification of documentary evidence and ordered the Adjudicating Authority to allow the Appellant to present their evidence and pass a considered order within 4 months to uphold principles of natural justice. en-us Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Jun 2023 10:08:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439208 The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority due to the alleged clandestine removal of MS items during a period of labour unrest, leading to discrepancies in stock quantities. The Appellant was not given the opportunity of a Personal Hearing, resulting in ex-parte orders. The Tribunal recognized the need for verification of documentary evidence and ordered the Adjudicating Authority to allow the Appellant to present their evidence and pass a considered order within 4 months to uphold principles of natural justice. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439208