https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439205 A remand for further inquiry was unjustified where the complaint alleging illegal gratification was unsupported by cogent material and rested mainly on suspicion. The Court noted that the regulator had already found no proof of bribery or illegal payment, and that the Tribunal had no basis to interfere with that factual finding. On the materials placed before it, there was no cause to require another round of inquiry, so the regulator's rejection of the complaint was restored and the challenge failed. en-us Fri, 24 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Jun 2023 10:08:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439205 A remand for further inquiry was unjustified where the complaint alleging illegal gratification was unsupported by cogent material and rested mainly on suspicion. The Court noted that the regulator had already found no proof of bribery or illegal payment, and that the Tribunal had no basis to interfere with that factual finding. On the materials placed before it, there was no cause to require another round of inquiry, so the regulator's rejection of the complaint was restored and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439205