<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 98 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33059</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in a tax dispute case. The Assessees were found liable to pay tax for providing &quot;Maintenance and Repair&quot; services from 16-6-2005, leading to the rejection of appeals by both the Revenue and the Assessees. The demand for tax for the specified period and penalties imposed were affirmed by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 98 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33059</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in a tax dispute case. The Assessees were found liable to pay tax for providing &quot;Maintenance and Repair&quot; services from 16-6-2005, leading to the rejection of appeals by both the Revenue and the Assessees. The demand for tax for the specified period and penalties imposed were affirmed by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>