<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 743 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439169</link>
    <description>The court upheld the CBDT&#039;s decision to reject the petitioner&#039;s application for condonation of a 16-year delay in filing the original return for AY-1998-1999. Despite acknowledging potential hardships faced by the petitioner, the court deemed the delay unreasonable, emphasizing the need to demonstrate valid reasons for such delays. Allowing condonation would have reopened the assessment for that year in a later assessment period, potentially affecting future set-offs or refunds. The court found no grounds to interfere and dismissed the petition, citing the excessive delay period and insufficient justification provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2023 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 743 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439169</link>
      <description>The court upheld the CBDT&#039;s decision to reject the petitioner&#039;s application for condonation of a 16-year delay in filing the original return for AY-1998-1999. Despite acknowledging potential hardships faced by the petitioner, the court deemed the delay unreasonable, emphasizing the need to demonstrate valid reasons for such delays. Allowing condonation would have reopened the assessment for that year in a later assessment period, potentially affecting future set-offs or refunds. The court found no grounds to interfere and dismissed the petition, citing the excessive delay period and insufficient justification provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>