https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439160 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals for assessment years 2008-09 and 2013-14, partially condoning the delay in filing, upholding the validity of the assessment reopening, and directing a lower disallowance percentage on cash expenses. The Tribunal also remanded appeals for 2010-11 and 2012-13 for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the need to consider merits even in the absence of the appellant. The revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the decisions in favor of the assessee. en-us Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439160 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals for assessment years 2008-09 and 2013-14, partially condoning the delay in filing, upholding the validity of the assessment reopening, and directing a lower disallowance percentage on cash expenses. The Tribunal also remanded appeals for 2010-11 and 2012-13 for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the need to consider merits even in the absence of the appellant. The revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the decisions in favor of the assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439160