<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 708 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439134</link>
    <description>Anti-dumping duty proceedings on flat rolled aluminium products from China PR resulted in final findings that dumped imports were present, the domestic industry had suffered material injury, and the injury was caused by those imports; the Central Government later issued a notification imposing duty for five years while excluding can-body stock and aluminium foil up to 80 microns. The appellant sought exclusion of colour coated aluminium coils from the duty scope and refund of duty collected, but a maintainability objection was raised because it had not participated in the investigation. Counsel then stated that relief in a parallel appeal would cover the appellant, so the application was rejected and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2023 08:10:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 708 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439134</link>
      <description>Anti-dumping duty proceedings on flat rolled aluminium products from China PR resulted in final findings that dumped imports were present, the domestic industry had suffered material injury, and the injury was caused by those imports; the Central Government later issued a notification imposing duty for five years while excluding can-body stock and aluminium foil up to 80 microns. The appellant sought exclusion of colour coated aluminium coils from the duty scope and refund of duty collected, but a maintainability objection was raised because it had not participated in the investigation. Counsel then stated that relief in a parallel appeal would cover the appellant, so the application was rejected and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>