https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439127 The Tribunal set aside the demand of Rs.21,76,056/- raised by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Large Taxpayer Unit, Chennai, against the appellant for the period April 2010 to March 2011. The Tribunal found inconsistencies in the Revenue's arguments regarding the treatment of trading activities and input credit, ultimately concluding that the demand was not sustainable due to baseless allegations. The appeal was allowed, and consequential benefits were granted to the appellant as per law. en-us Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jun 2023 08:09:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439127 The Tribunal set aside the demand of Rs.21,76,056/- raised by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Large Taxpayer Unit, Chennai, against the appellant for the period April 2010 to March 2011. The Tribunal found inconsistencies in the Revenue's arguments regarding the treatment of trading activities and input credit, ultimately concluding that the demand was not sustainable due to baseless allegations. The appeal was allowed, and consequential benefits were granted to the appellant as per law. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439127