<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 699 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439125</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s S.A. Engineering Works, setting aside the confirmation of service tax demand for the period July 2005 to February 2007. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant did not provide manpower recruitment and supply agency services as alleged, as the payments were for job work activities and not for supplying manpower. Therefore, the demand was deemed unjustified, and the appellant was granted relief in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2023 08:09:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 699 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439125</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s S.A. Engineering Works, setting aside the confirmation of service tax demand for the period July 2005 to February 2007. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant did not provide manpower recruitment and supply agency services as alleged, as the payments were for job work activities and not for supplying manpower. Therefore, the demand was deemed unjustified, and the appellant was granted relief in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>