<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 694 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439120</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant, a DGM Finance at M/s. Electrotherm (India) Ltd, from Rs. 10 lacs to Rs. 1 lac under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Despite the appellant&#039;s limited direct involvement in the duty evasion, the Tribunal held him accountable due to his position, showing leniency in the penalty reduction. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the impugned order accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2023 08:09:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 694 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439120</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant, a DGM Finance at M/s. Electrotherm (India) Ltd, from Rs. 10 lacs to Rs. 1 lac under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Despite the appellant&#039;s limited direct involvement in the duty evasion, the Tribunal held him accountable due to his position, showing leniency in the penalty reduction. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the impugned order accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>