https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439119 The tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the rejection of remission of duty and the consequential demand of excise duty. The decision was based on the finding that the fire was accidental, the appellant had followed necessary procedures, and had reversed the cenvat credit involved in the destroyed goods. The appeals were pronounced in the open court on 15.06.2023. en-us Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jun 2023 08:09:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439119 The tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the rejection of remission of duty and the consequential demand of excise duty. The decision was based on the finding that the fire was accidental, the appellant had followed necessary procedures, and had reversed the cenvat credit involved in the destroyed goods. The appeals were pronounced in the open court on 15.06.2023. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439119