<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 210 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33043</link>
    <description>Cash replenishment and ATM caretaker services rendered from April 2005 to December 2005 were held not taxable under Business Auxiliary Services because the same Bench had already ruled in the assessee&#039;s own case that such services became taxable only from 1 May 2006. As the services in dispute were provided before that effective date, they did not attract service tax for the relevant period, and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 210 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33043</link>
      <description>Cash replenishment and ATM caretaker services rendered from April 2005 to December 2005 were held not taxable under Business Auxiliary Services because the same Bench had already ruled in the assessee&#039;s own case that such services became taxable only from 1 May 2006. As the services in dispute were provided before that effective date, they did not attract service tax for the relevant period, and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>