https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308334 In allegations arising from a cash-for-job recruitment scam, the Court reiterated that discharge and quash relief depends on prima facie material, not a trial-level evaluation, and upheld the refusal to interfere where the record disclosed recruitment irregularities and receipt of money for appointments. It also held that compromise could not justify quashing in a corruption-linked matter with wider public impact. Finding the investigation incomplete and piecemeal, with forensic material not awaited before the final report, the Court directed de novo reinvestigation from the beginning in the connected cases to secure a fair and comprehensive probe. The impleading petitions were dismissed for want of an independent right to be heard. en-us Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Jun 2023 21:39:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308334 In allegations arising from a cash-for-job recruitment scam, the Court reiterated that discharge and quash relief depends on prima facie material, not a trial-level evaluation, and upheld the refusal to interfere where the record disclosed recruitment irregularities and receipt of money for appointments. It also held that compromise could not justify quashing in a corruption-linked matter with wider public impact. Finding the investigation incomplete and piecemeal, with forensic material not awaited before the final report, the Court directed de novo reinvestigation from the beginning in the connected cases to secure a fair and comprehensive probe. The impleading petitions were dismissed for want of an independent right to be heard. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308334