<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 94 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33042</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, a provider of Public Transport System, was liable to pay service tax for providing space for advertisement services under the category of &quot;Sale of space or time for advertisement.&quot; The appellant&#039;s argument that the advertiser should pay the tax was rejected as the definition of the service tax category encompassed any service related to the sale of advertisement space. The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 1,00,000 within six weeks, with the balance amount of tax and penalties waived until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The decision emphasized the importance of contractual terms and legal provisions in determining tax liability for advertisement services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 94 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33042</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, a provider of Public Transport System, was liable to pay service tax for providing space for advertisement services under the category of &quot;Sale of space or time for advertisement.&quot; The appellant&#039;s argument that the advertiser should pay the tax was rejected as the definition of the service tax category encompassed any service related to the sale of advertisement space. The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 1,00,000 within six weeks, with the balance amount of tax and penalties waived until the appeal&#039;s disposal. The decision emphasized the importance of contractual terms and legal provisions in determining tax liability for advertisement services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>