<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 666 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439092</link>
    <description>The quantum appeal became infructuous because the assessee ed the taxability of the disputed interest on land compensation and did not contest the assessed income before the appellate forum. With only concern remaining as to the effect of an unverified return filed in reassessment proceedings and a possible penalty, there was no live issue on the assessment itself for adjudication. Any challenge to penalty could arise only if penalty was actually imposed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=716709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 666 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439092</link>
      <description>The quantum appeal became infructuous because the assessee ed the taxability of the disputed interest on land compensation and did not contest the assessed income before the appellate forum. With only concern remaining as to the effect of an unverified return filed in reassessment proceedings and a possible penalty, there was no live issue on the assessment itself for adjudication. Any challenge to penalty could arise only if penalty was actually imposed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>